From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:47:00 -0400 Received: from mail.scs.ch ([212.254.229.5]:46344 "EHLO mail.scs.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:46:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3B1E16EB.9FEA94CA@scs.ch> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 13:41:31 +0200 From: Thomas Sailer Reply-To: t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch Organization: SCS X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac9 In-Reply-To: <200106061051.f56App623652@ns.caldera.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig schrieb: > > In article <20010605234928.A28971@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> you wrote: > > 2.4.5-ac9 > > > o Add es1371 sound driver locking (Frank Davis) > > It's buggy. The locking in ->read and ->write will give > double ups when a signal is pending and remove a not added waitq > when programming the dmabuf fails. But Alan added a different patch than yours, that doesn't seem to have poll in the guard. Also, both your and Frank Davis' patch don't care about dac, which seems bogus to me. Tom