From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:26:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:26:02 -0400 Received: from armitage.toyota.com ([63.87.74.3]:46862 "EHLO armitage.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:25:52 -0400 Message-ID: <3B265085.32DFDBAF@lexus.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:25:26 -0700 From: J Sloan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk CC: Linux kernel Subject: [OT]: Tux vs khttpd? (fwd) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Roy, IIRC Ingo posted some tux benchmark results on the khttpd mailing list some weeks ago - basically khttpd is not in the same ballpark at this point. cu jjs Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I tried to send this message to the khttpd group, but got no answer. Can > any of you help me? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 17:31:20 +0000 > From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > To: khttpd-users@zgp.org > Subject: Tux vs khttpd? > > hi > > Does anyone know any details about how Tux performs in comparison with > khttpd? > Is this a separate project, or is it a somehow 'better version' of the > khttpd? > Are these going to be merged? > > roy > ----- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/