From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:24:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:24:16 -0400 Received: from cr626425-a.bloor1.on.wave.home.com ([24.156.35.8]:21008 "EHLO spqr.damncats.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:24:10 -0400 Message-ID: <3B29F056.97C353C@damncats.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:24:06 -0400 From: John Cavan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-ac14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= CC: Linux Kernel List , DRI-Devel , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac14 In-Reply-To: <20010615022033Z261561-17720+4111@vger.kernel.org> <3B29734A.738A95D5@damncats.org> <200106150442.AAA22505@spqr.damncats.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2001 05:32 schrieb Dieter Nützel: > > Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2001 04:30 schrieb John Cavan: > > > Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > > Hello Alan, > > > > > > > > I see 4.29 GB under shm with your latest try. > > > > something wrong? > > > > > > total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: > > > Mem: 1053483008 431419392 622063616 122880 24387584 260923392 > > > Swap: 394764288 0 394764288 > > > MemTotal: 1028792 kB > > > MemFree: 607484 kB > > > MemShared: 120 kB > > > Buffers: 23816 kB > > > Cached: 254808 kB > > > Active: 225536 kB > > > Inact_dirty: 53208 kB > > > Inact_clean: 0 kB > > > Inact_target: 44 kB > > > HighTotal: 131056 kB > > > HighFree: 1048 kB > > > LowTotal: 897736 kB > > > LowFree: 606436 kB > > > SwapTotal: 385512 kB > > > SwapFree: 385512 kB > > > > > > I don't seem to have the problem... > > > > You are using HIGHMEM?! Sort of necessary when you have 1gb of RAM. My machine is also a dual CPU box. > I tested some more and found this. > > It is XFree86 4.1.0 DRI (tdfx driver) related. > During my first run I used the 2.4.5-ac14 kernel DRM module. > Now I am running with the latest DRI trunk DRM module. > Both show the same symptoms. Well, I'm running XFree86 4.1.0 DRI with the Radeon driver and I don't show the symptoms. I use the Radeon module from DRI on SourceForge. Have you tried it with CONFIG_HIGHMEM in the kernel? John