From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:57:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:57:26 -0400 Received: from hssx-sktn-167-47.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.167.47]:16388 "HELO mail.thock.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:57:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3B2FD8D6.ED04B275@bigfoot.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:57:26 -0600 From: Dylan Griffiths X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Love Cc: Daniel Bertrand , emu10k1-devel , Linux kernel Subject: Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Buggy emu10k1 drivers. In-Reply-To: <992822448.3798.6.camel@phantasy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Love wrote: > > Can you give the CVS driver a try? Snapshots are available here: > > http://opensource.creative.com/snapshot.html > > > > The driver in the kernel is based on a CVS snapshot from last summer, the > > problem may be fixed in CVS. Also, the CVS driver is a common driver for > > 2.2 and 2.4 (with some #ifdef), so it may be useful to see if it works for > > you on 2.4.5 but not on 2.2.19. > > if the driver in the kernel is that old, could we try merging a newer > release? is there any reason why it has not been done yet? Tried 2.4.5 and 2.2.19 with the same snapshot code (emu10k1-20010617.tar.gz) 2.4.5 works, 2.2.19 doesn't. Maybe 2.2.19 has deeper problems with my hardware which aren't in the driver, then, as identical code works on one and not the other. -- www.kuro5hin.org -- technology and culture, from the trenches.