From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:35:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:35:24 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.0.238]:8455 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:34:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3B6189E2.77F072DD@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:33:54 +0400 From: Hans Reiser Organization: Namesys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: Joshua Schmidlkofer , kernel , Chris Mason Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption In-Reply-To: <0107270818120A.06707@widmers.oce.srci.oce.int> <0107271706460G.00285@starship> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Friday 27 July 2001 16:18, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > > I've almost quit using reiser, because everytime I have a power > > outage, the last 2 or three files that I've editted, even ones that I > > haven't touched in a while, will usually be hopelessly corrupted. > > My early flush patch will fix this, or at least it will if I get > together with the ReiserFS guys and figure out how to integrate their > flushing mechanism with the standard bdflush. Or they could > incorporate the ideas from my early flush in their own flush daemon, > though generalizing the standard flush would have more value in the > long run. Can you describe early flush? > > > The '~' that Emacs makes is usually fine though. > > Because it's "created" by a rename. > > [...] > > Once, I lost power in on my SQL box, [it was blessedly during a > > period of no use.] I had to rebuild all the indexes. Not only > > THAT, but what happens to that box if I lose power whilst in the > > middle of operations? I am working on the migration plan to move that > > to XFS because of these concerns. [However, I am doing a better job > > of testing with XFS first.] > > Help is on its way. You can try full-data journalling with the journal > on NVRAM or on a separate disk. You can also wait for me to get a Well, if you have NVRAM, you might try using our new journal relocation patch to put the journal on NVRAM. > I think it's not hard to fix. > > -- > Daniel