From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 14:12:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 14:12:30 -0400 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:17675 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 14:12:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3B7030B3.9F2E8E67@zip.com.au> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 11:17:23 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben LaHaise CC: Linus Torvalds , Daniel Phillips , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ben LaHaise wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Try pre4. > > It's similarly awful (what did you expect -- there are no meaningful > changes between the two!). io throughput to a 12 disk array is humming > along at a whopping 40MB/s (can do 80) that's very spotty and jerky, > mostly being driven by syncs. vmscan gets delayed occasionally, and small > interactive program loading varies from not to long (3s) to way too long > (> 30s). Ben, are you using software RAID? The throughput problems which Mike Black has been seeing with ext3 seem to be specific to an interaction with software RAID5 and possibly highmem. I've never been able to reproduce them.