From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:39:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:39:28 -0400 Received: from cx570538-a.elcjn1.sdca.home.com ([24.5.14.144]:10112 "EHLO keroon.dmz.dreampark.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:39:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3B73564D.9F6A8756@randomlogic.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 20:34:37 -0700 From: "Paul G. Allen" Organization: Akamai Technologies, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-ac10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Linux kernel developer's mailing list" Subject: Re: Q: Kernel patching In-Reply-To: <3B733C28.EE0C5D4@randomlogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Paul G. Allen" wrote: > > I've never applied a patch to a kernel before, so please bear with me. > > Applying patch-2.4.7-ac10 to kernel 2.4.7 I get many messages such as > this: > > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file > include/asm-um/segment.h.rej > The next patch would create the file include/asm-um/semaphore.h, > which already exists! Skipping patch. > OK, I got it to work. My mistake was trying to use patch-kernel instead of just patch. PGA -- Paul G. Allen UNIX Admin II/Network Security Akamai Technologies, Inc. www.akamai.com