From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:39:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:39:47 -0400 Received: from dsl254-089-216.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.89.216]:16382 "EHLO dragon") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:39:37 -0400 Message-ID: <3B7A97C5.9090207@infiniconsys.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:39:49 -0400 From: Michael Heinz Organization: InfiniCon Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-ics i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010316 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Implications of PG_locked and reference count in page structures.... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm in the process of porting a driver to Linux. The author of the driver conveniently broke it into os-dependent and independent sections. One of the things in the "OS" dependent section is a routine to lock a section of memory presumably to be used for DMA. So, what I want to do is this: given a pointer to a previously kmalloc'ed block, and the length of that block, I want to (a) identify each page associated with the block and (b) lock each page. It appears that I can lock the page either by incrementing it's reference count, or by setting the PG_locked flag for the page. Which method is preferred? Is there another method I should be using instead?