From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:30:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:30:10 -0400 Received: from mg02.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.12]:34497 "EHLO mg02.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8AADA5.FBB2DAF8@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:29:25 -0500 From: Andrew Theurer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Reiser CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: Journal Filesystem Comparison on Netbench In-Reply-To: <3B8A6122.3C784F2D@us.ibm.com> <3B8AA7B9.8EB836FF@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I will test -notail as soon as possible and let you know the results. Thanks, Andrew Theurer Hans Reiser wrote: > > Please mount with -notails and repeat your results. ReiserFS can either save > you on disk space, or save you on performance, but not both at the same time. > That said, it does not surprise me that our locking is coarser than other > filesystems, and we will be fixing that in version 4. Unfortunately we don't > have the hardware to replicate your results. > > Hans > > Andrew Theurer wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I recently starting doing some fs performance comparisons with Netbench > > and the journal filesystems available in 2.4: Reiserfs, JFS, XFS, and > > Ext3. I thought some of you may be interested in the results. Below > > is the README from the http://lse.sourceforge.net. There is a kernprof > > for each test, and I am working on the lockmeter stuff right now. Let > > me > > know if you have any comments. > > > > Andrew Theurer > > IBM LTC > > [snip]