From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:53:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:52:54 -0400 Received: from relay1.zonnet.nl ([62.58.50.37]:38391 "EHLO relay1.zonnet.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:52:40 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8FDD03.FABE1F8F@linux-m68k.org> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:52:51 +0200 From: Roman Zippel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: acc@CS.Stanford.EDU CC: ptb@it.uc3m.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war In-Reply-To: <20010831112905.A20937@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Andy Chou wrote: > SVC isn't the "Stanford Checker" that has been resulting in kernel > patches. The name "Stanford Checker" was invented by people on LKML; the > real name of the project is Meta-level compilation, and its URL is: > > http://hands.stanford.edu Sorry, I should have checked it more carefully. (bad google... :) ) bye, Roman