* Clear indication of stable -ac kernels?
@ 2001-10-04 2:22 David L. Parsley
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David L. Parsley @ 2001-10-04 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: laughing; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Alan,
I was just wondering if you might stamp your kernel releases clearly
with some indication of stable/probably stable/don't bet the farm - or
some such. I've got a big-ish (2 X 1Ghz, 1.5G) multi-user terminal
server that's having bits of flakiness (which I suspect are recently
fixed), and could probably stand a kernel upgrade. I'm guessing that
2.4.10-ac4 is probably a good bet, but I'd sure be happy if you'd make
clear statements to that effect. ;-) (i.e., when Linus releases
something non-pre, I assume he means 'I think this is stable' - even
though he's not always right, I still feel better trying those in
production than any of his -pre's)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator, Roanoke College
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then
they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-10-04 2:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-04 2:22 Clear indication of stable -ac kernels? David L. Parsley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).