From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:12:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:12:49 -0400 Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157]:24537 "EHLO zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:12:39 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD6F701.32E34BA5@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:14:41 -0400 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: "Christopher Friesen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-custom i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Hockin Cc: "Christopher Friesen" , David Ford , Julian Anastasov , Tim Hockin , linux-kernel Subject: Re: issue: deleting one IP alias deletes all In-Reply-To: <200110241534.f9OFYnL14565@www.hockin.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Orig: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tim Hockin wrote: > > > > Switch to 'ip' instead of 'ifconfig', several large distros now include > > > it. Addresses can be added and removed completely indiscriminately on > > > interfaces. > > > > > > The "ethN:X" is a legacy design that is now deprecated. > > > > Minor issue...if I create (using 'ip') two addresses on the same subnet on the > > same device, one of them is primary and the other is secondary. If I then > > delete the primary address, the second one goes with it. > > > > I submit that this is bad behaviour. > > This is the same behavior for which I am proposing fixing. The origin of > the thread, if you will. Yes, precisely. I was rebutting David Ford's statement above about addresses being added and removed indiscriminately using 'ip' but not using aliases. Chris -- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com