From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S279952AbRKDHBN>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:01:13 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S279953AbRKDHBF>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:01:05 -0500
Received: from lsmls02.we.mediaone.net ([24.130.1.15]:19921 "EHLO
	lsmls02.we.mediaone.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S279952AbRKDHAz>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:00:55 -0500
Message-ID: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 23:03:17 -0800
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

I get the impression that Alan stress-tests his kernels
more than Linus does before releasing them.

Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure
his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before
releasing them?  (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.)

- Dan