From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 07:01:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 07:01:36 -0500 Received: from laas.laas.fr ([140.93.0.15]:758 "EHLO laas.laas.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 07:01:17 -0500 Message-ID: <3BE52ECB.DFE7B040@laas.fr> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 13:04:27 +0100 From: Tahar Reply-To: jarboui@laas.fr Organization: LAAS-CNRS X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Deppner CC: Dan Kegel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? In-Reply-To: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com> <20011103231503.A16083@dondra.ofc.psyber.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Yes it would. It would be a better idea if everyone (including you and > me) stress test those pre and final kernels too. Just a newbie question: where can we find such stress tests, and what are the kernel parts targeted by these tests ? Thanks, Tahar