From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281139AbRKENMz>; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 08:12:55 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281138AbRKENMp>; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 08:12:45 -0500
Received: from as4-1-7.has.s.bonet.se ([217.215.31.238]:14989 "EHLO
	k-7.stesmi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S281135AbRKENMj>;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 08:12:39 -0500
Message-ID: <3BE69057.2040205@stesmi.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:12:55 +0100
From: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
CC: Mailing List - Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111050958030.659-100000@chaos2.streamgroup.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi.

>>Another word for it might be BETA...
>>
> 
> Nope, it's release quality material.

When something really is release quality material it is released.

It might be good, I'm not arguing, but if they won't release it yet then 
   it's probably good, not totally release quality.

// Stefan