From: John Weber <weber@nyc.rr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: binfmt_misc and /proc
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:59:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE6C571.3EBD39EC@nyc.rr.com> (raw)
I am running 2.4.13. What is the rationale for forcing users to mount
/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc separately? I personally find the idea of
mounting "none" to some subspace of /proc a little disturbing -- I don't
like breaking metaphors :).
reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE6C571.3EBD39EC@nyc.rr.com \
--to=weber@nyc.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).