From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:45:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:45:20 -0500 Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:33543 "EHLO toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:44:35 -0500 Message-ID: <3BE9AB3A.DFC6855F@lexus.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 13:44:27 -0800 From: J Sloan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rpjday CC: Linux kernel Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org rpjday wrote: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, J Sloan wrote: > > > "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 03:49 PM, Roeland Th. Jansen wrote: > > > > > > > when mounting an EFS cd on the loop it also froze. this is _without_ > > > > removing the lines. ... > > > > > > I'm a little confused. How did you even get a working kernel (or module) > > > without removing the lines? > > > > > > > Probably compiled it modular - > > if you try to compile it modular, the "make modules" will work, but > the "make modules_install" will choke after copying the modules under > /lib/modules when it tries to run the final "depmod" at the end. > > so, yes, i'm curious -- how did he get a final kernel and modules > without removing those lines? I got a kernel and modules without removing those lines - it complains at depmod, but the kernel and modules do build and install - I didn't ever boot to that kernel since the warning bothered me, and I fixed the source and recompiled before booting into 2.4.14 - cu jjs