linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andrew Scott" <A.J.Scott@casdn.neu.edu>
To: Greg Boyce <gboyce@rakis.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Machines misreporting Bogomips
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:13:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C63C0E3.17319.A2A062@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.42.0201311747560.24180-100000@egg>

On 31 Jan 2002 at 17:55, Greg Boyce wrote:

> kernel folk,
> 
> I've got a strange issue that I've been struggling to find the solution to
> for some time now.
> 
> I work in a group that assists in the managing of large numbers of
> deployed linux boxes running variants of the 2.2 kernel on them.  The
> machines themselves are all pretty standard.  There are slight variances
> on vendors, cpu speeds, etc., but they're all running from the same
> motherboards.
> 
> Every once in a while we come across single machines which are running a
> lot slower than they should be, and are misreporting their speed in
> bogomips under /proc/cpuinfo.  Reinstalling the OS and changing versions
> of the kernel don't appear to affect the machines themselves at all.
> 
> I was wondering if anyone would be able to provide me with a starting
> point to hunt this down.  The only solution we had found in the past was
> to replace the machines, but some of them are located out of the country
> and that would be expensive.

It seems to me that there was an issue with timers not being set up 
properly, or changing their settings during startup, which could cause a 
machine to behave like it was running slow.  On more recent 2.2.x kernels 
you would see a line like 'timer configuration lost' in dmesg, which meant 
that the computer had the problem, and a workaround was being implimented. 

On kernels that didn't detect the timer problem you could sometimes boot 
with no problem, but other times you'd get a kernel that seemed to run very 
slowly.

I don't remember if it affected the bogomips reporting, but I would think 
that it could.

BTW, I think that the kernels I had the problems with were pre 2.2.17, 
though I'm not positive. 2.2.20 and 2.2.19 do not exhibit the problem. i.e. 
they detect the problem and work around it.




                      _
                     / \   / ascott@casdn.neu.edu
                    / \ \ /
                   /   \_/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-08 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-31 22:55 Machines misreporting Bogomips Greg Boyce
2002-01-31 23:21 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-01-31 23:30   ` Roger Larsson
2002-02-01  0:11     ` Greg Boyce
2002-02-01  9:59 ` Horst von Brand
2002-02-01 17:11   ` Greg Boyce
2002-02-01 12:59     ` gmack
2002-02-01 20:53       ` Greg Boyce
2002-02-01 23:41         ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 23:34           ` Greg Boyce
2002-02-01 23:59             ` Alan Cox
2002-02-03 22:05             ` Juhan Ernits
2002-02-03  7:39   ` watermodem
2002-02-08 17:13 ` Andrew Scott [this message]
     [not found] <no.id>
2002-02-03 21:40 ` Barry K. Nathan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C63C0E3.17319.A2A062@localhost \
    --to=a.j.scott@casdn.neu.edu \
    --cc=gboyce@rakis.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).