From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:39:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:39:06 -0400 Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:46045 "EHLO zcars04e.ca.nortel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:39:05 -0400 Message-ID: <3D4964AE.891F9878@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:41:18 -0400 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Alan Cox , Benjamin LaHaise , Pavel Machek , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for2.5.29) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > The only thing that I think makes it less than wonderful is really the > fact that we cannot give an accurate measure for it. We can _say_ that > what we count in microseconds, but it might turn out that instead of the > perfect 1000000 ticks a second ther would really be 983671 ticks. Would there be any benefit to using processor timestamps (rdtsc and friends) for this if they are available? I don't know the complexities of the interaction with power management, that might make it infeasable. Chris -- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com