From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319044AbSIJGVl>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319047AbSIJGVl>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:41 -0400
Received: from imo-r10.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.106]:31463 "EHLO
	imo-r10.mx.aol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S319044AbSIJGVk>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:40 -0400
Message-ID: <3D7D8FF4.5050106@netscape.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:23:48 +1000
From: Wade <darthwaderr@netscape.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020518
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209091930370.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In the long run, for sure. I'm not saying Linus needs to be replaced, 
but his _manners_ could do with some work. Those XFS guys have worked 
quite hard to make the merge fairly painless, and Linus wont even 
comment (that I've seen, see 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103118187002156&w=2).

BTW: I'm only a lurker, I don't even use XFS :-)

[ _XXX_ is (C) 2002 Linus Torvalds. ]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Wade wrote:
> 
> 
>>I've noticed this too. And I must say, ITS QUITE FUCKING RUDE OF LINUS.
> 
> 
> If you think you can do things better you should fork Wadix ;)
> 
> Linus might not be the easiest user interface and I've had some
> problems too in the past, but everybody will have to admit that
> the current system just works in the long run.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Rik