From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:33:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:33:33 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]:2806 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:33:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3D80EB90.3020304@watson.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:31:28 -0400 From: Shailabh Nagar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020408 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise CC: Linux Aio , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5 port of aio-20020619 for raw devices References: <3D80DB14.2040809@watson.ibm.com> <20020912143540.J18217@redhat.com> <3D80DEF4.1080906@watson.ibm.com> <20020912145324.L18217@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:37:40PM -0400, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > >>So does the kvec structure go away (and some variant of dio get used) ? >> > >That's orthogonal. kvecs are really just bio_vecs for use by any code >that has to pass around data that is scatter-gathered. > > -ben > I see. So generic_aio_rw would directly call some function which used dio's rather than map the kvec first and call a kvec_op ?