From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:51:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:51:48 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:24194 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3D8408A9.7B34483D@digeo.com> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:12:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-rc5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: 2.5.34-mm2 References: <3D803434.F2A58357@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2002 03:56:36.0676 (UTC) FILETIME=[E36F1840:01C25C6B] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Thursday 12 September 2002 08:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > > url: http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.34/2.5.34-mm2/ > > > > -sleeping-release_page.patch > > What's this one? Couldn't find it as a broken-out patch. The `-' means it was removed from the patchset. Linus merged it. See 2.5.34/2.5.34-mm1/broken-out/sleeping-release_page.patch > On the nonblocking vm front, does it rule or suck? It rules, until someone finds something at which it sucks. > I heard you > mention, on the one hand, huge speedups on some load (dbench I think) > but your in-patch comments mention slowdown by 1.7X on kernel > compile. You misread. Relative times for running `make -j6 bzImage' with mem=512m: Unloaded system: 1.0 2.5.34-mm4, while running 4 x `dbench 100' 1.7 Any other kernel while running 4 x `dbench 100' basically infinity