From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:30:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:30:34 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:20868 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3D891BD1.8F774946@digeo.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:35:29 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duncan Sands CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fsync 50 times slower after 2.5.27 References: <200209190222.33276.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2002 00:35:29.0825 (UTC) FILETIME=[74AEC110:01C25F74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Duncan Sands wrote: > > I noticed a performance degradation in recent kernels: > fsync takes around 50 times longer in kernels 2.5.28 to > 2.5.34 when the system is under heavy load, as compared > to kernels <= 2.5.27. I noticed this because it makes kmail > unusable. 2.5.34 is the most recent kernel I tested. > Please try replacing the yield() in fs/jbd/transaction.c with set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); schedule();