linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Larry Kessler <kessler@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	cgl_discussion mailing list <cgl_discussion@osdl.org>,
	evlog mailing list <evlog-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Hien Nguyen <hien@us.ibm.com>,
	James Keniston <kenistoj@us.ibm.com>,
	Mike Sullivan <sullivam@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [evlog-dev] Re: alternate event logging proposal
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:26:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D90D889.2040608@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D90D503.8F4CDEB6@us.ibm.com

Larry Kessler wrote:
> Event logging uses real-time signaling to notify a process that's registered
> for notification that an event matching the criteria defined during 
> registration has been written to the event log.  When notified, the process
> can read the entire event from the event log and then do whatever.


I've already seen the event logging userspace API, thanks.

Are you saying that netlink is not useful for event delivery inside the 
kernel?  It seems useful to me.  Are you saying that netlink is 
incompatible with the POSIX event logging interface?  My initial 
thinking is that it seems compatible, just the syscalls[interface] is a 
bit different.

Both your messages simply described and re-described POSIX event 
logging, without actually responding to my suggestion.  Are you just 
quoting specifications because you would rather not look into netlink 
and explore new options?

I would rather avoid the kernel bloat of two pieces of kernel code doing 
the pretty much the same thing internally.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-24 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-24  1:54 [PATCH-RFC} 3 of 4 - New problem logging macros, plus template generation Larry Kessler
2002-09-24  2:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  5:47   ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24  6:05     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  7:06       ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24  7:23         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  7:30           ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24 19:48             ` alternate event logging proposal Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 19:57               ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-24 20:03                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 20:54                   ` Tim Hockin
2002-09-24 22:32                     ` Brad Hards
2002-09-24 23:31                       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 23:37                         ` Brad Hards
2002-09-24 23:59                           ` Tim Hockin
2002-09-24 23:38                         ` Tim Hockin
2002-09-25  0:09                           ` Ben Greear
2002-09-25  0:47                             ` Tim Hockin
2002-09-25  1:14                               ` Brad Hards
2002-09-25  1:38                                 ` Tim Hockin
2002-09-24 20:09                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 20:27                   ` [evlog-dev] " Larry Kessler
2002-09-24 20:35                     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 21:11                       ` Larry Kessler
2002-09-24 21:26                         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-09-25  0:15                           ` Larry Kessler
2002-09-24 21:27                         ` Horst von Brand
2002-09-24 21:50                           ` Larry Kessler
2002-09-25 14:44                 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-24 20:54               ` [evlog-dev] " Daniel E. F. Stekloff
2002-09-24 21:04                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-30 22:43                 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D90D889.2040608@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=cgl_discussion@osdl.org \
    --cc=evlog-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hien@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kenistoj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kessler@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sullivam@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).