From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:07:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:07:06 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:22716 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:07:06 -0400 Message-ID: <3D926046.4C098C3A@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:17:58 -0700 From: Nivedita Singhvi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification References: <3D924F9D.C2DCF56A@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20020925.170336.77023245.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > I guess he's thinking of the FIB, not the routing cache. I was, + chain explansion, but this is just (um, cough) to s/he/she :) thanks, Nivedita > The current FIBs have a bit heavier locking at least. Fine grain locking > btrees is also not easy/nice. > > -Andi