From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:02:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:02:37 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:19077 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:02:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3D94AC8B.4AB6EB09@digeo.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:07:55 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Justin T. Gibbs" CC: James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Matthew Jacob , "Pedro M. Rodrigues" , Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning - running *really* short on DMA buffers while doingfile transfers References: <200209271721.g8RHLTn05231@localhost.localdomain> <2543856224.1033153019@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2002 19:07:48.0149 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B20D650:01C26659] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > > ... > > The evidence is here: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103302456113997&w=1 > > Which unfortunately characterizes only a single symptom without breaking > it down on a transaction by transaction basis. We need to understand > how many writes were queued by the OS to the drive between each read to > know if the drive is actually allowing writes to pass reads or not. > Given that I measured a two-second read latency with four tags, that would be about 60 megabytes of write traffic after the read was submitted. Say, 120 requests. That's with a tag depth of four. Not sure how old the disk is. It's a 36G Fujitsu SCA-2. Manufactured in 2000, perhaps??