linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Paul P Komkoff Jr <i@stingr.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	god@namesys.com
Subject: Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:49:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9A0A55.2030605@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D9A08E1.4040905@namesys.com

Hans Reiser wrote:

> Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
>
>> This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
>>
>> We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
>> directory, then delete it in order.
>>
>> Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
>> evaluated because it will take long long time ...
>>
>> both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
>> data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
>>
>>                real               user          sys
>> reiserfs:
>> Creating:     3m13.208s    0m4.412s    2m54.404s
>> Deleting:    4m41.250s    0m4.206s    4m17.926s
>>
>> Ext3:
>> Creating:    4m9.331s    0m3.927s    2m21.757s
>> Deleting:    9m14.838s    0m3.446s    1m39.508s
>>
>> htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
>> to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
>>
>>  
>>
> Can you send us the code so we can try it on reiser4?  We are going to 
> release reiser4 sometime this month (don't ask me when), and we'd be 
> happy to see you run it when you do.

^you^we

Sorry to list for bandwidth waste.



  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-01 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-01 19:59 [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 20:49   ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2002-10-01 21:17     ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 21:31     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 21:19   ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-02 10:48   ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 16:54     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-03  0:37       ` [Ext2-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 12:04         ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-03 19:40           ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 19:44             ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-04 15:53   ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-04 17:09     ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-07  6:54       ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-10  0:27       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 21:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-02 16:38   ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02  6:39 ` Nikita Danilov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D9A0A55.2030605@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=god@namesys.com \
    --cc=i@stingr.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).