From: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 22:09:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9C4FA8.10201@metaparadigm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1033648730.28022.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk
On 10/03/02 20:38, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 06:50, Michael Clark wrote:
>
>>>... and you don't need EVMS for that.
>>
>>But EVMS would be an excellent substitute in the mean time.
>>
>>Better to having something excellent now than something perfect but
>>too late.
>
>
> You can see who around here has maintained kernel code and who hasnt.
> You don't want a substitute in the mean time, because then you have to
> get rid of it
Like LVM ;)
/me submits to the masters and waits in subjugation.
Just hoping for good Volume Manager in 2.6 and EVMS looks good
to me from an end user perspective, and also seems quite timely.
~mc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 14:06 [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) Joe Thornber
2002-10-01 14:15 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-01 14:52 ` venom
2002-10-01 15:48 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-01 16:06 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 16:35 ` Joe Thornber
2002-10-01 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 23:19 ` venom
2002-10-01 18:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 1:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 4:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-02 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 14:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 22:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 23:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-02 23:22 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-03 5:50 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-03 12:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-03 14:09 ` Michael Clark [this message]
2002-10-03 15:07 ` Shawn
2002-10-03 15:22 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-06 5:05 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-01 19:12 ` Matthias Andree
2002-10-01 23:25 ` venom
2002-10-01 17:09 ` Status of InterMezzo in 2.5 Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 14:40 ` [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 14:54 ` Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9C4FA8.10201@metaparadigm.com \
--to=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).