From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:26:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:26:49 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:45580 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:26:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA5B99B.5080707@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:32:11 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Ravnborg CC: linux-kernel , kbuild-devel Subject: Re: linux kernel conf 0.8 References: <3DA58C1E.3090102@pobox.com> <20021010192924.A13618@mars.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sam Ravnborg wrote: > [cc: trimmed] > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:18:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Personally I don't care about Config dependency checking... they are >>not modified often enough to affect me, and even if they did, dependency >>checking based on changes to Config files can get ugly, AFAICS. I just >>do a "bk -r co -Sq" and am done with it... > > I care a lot about Config dependency checking, and you are not within the > group of people that I care about in this respect. > > kernel-hackers has no problem realising that a "make oldconfig" is needed. > > But I care about NN that follows 2.6 development, and update his/her > tree each time a new version is posted at kernel.org. > This group of people needs dependency checking on Config files - > as can be seen by the number of reports that boils down to > "run make oldconfig". The kernel is written for people with a clue. For people without a clue, they should use a vendor kernel or ESR's Aunt-Tillie-friendly system. Dumbing-down the kernel is never the right answer. Jeff