From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:18:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:18:56 -0500 Received: from host182-156.pool80116.interbusiness.it ([80.116.156.182]:39043 "EHLO igor.opun.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:18:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3E2472BE.12D0BDC5@libero.it> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:27:42 +0100 From: Abramo Bagnara X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry McVoy Cc: Dax Kelson , Richard Stallman , root@chaos.analogic.com, pollard@admin.navo.hpc.mil, R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl, jalvo@mbay.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him References: <20030114190600.GC19154@work.bitmover.com> <20030114200202.GG19154@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Larry McVoy wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:56:39PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: > > For nearly 10 years I've read many posts by RMS and the replies that > > follow. RMS's posts seem calm, rational and clearly presented. For the > > most part, the replies are emotional, high strung, and mean spirited > > personal attacks. > > If I calmly, rationally, and clearly state things which are not true, > are self serving, and are not relevant to a forum, what should I expect > in response? Are you serious about that? Do you known *any* absolute, objective, irrefutable truth? Would you like to perjury that *every* one of your posting is not self serving and fully relevant? Please stop that: I think you know as well as me that Dax is right. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo.bagnara@libero.it Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy