From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751292AbcGMVSc (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:18:32 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:25209 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbcGMVSW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:18:22 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,359,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="138704253" From: "Yu, Fenghua" To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Ingo Molnar , "Anvin, H Peter" , "Luck, Tony" , Tejun Heo , "Borislav Petkov" , Stephane Eranian , Peter Zijlstra , Marcelo Tosatti , "David Carrillo-Cisneros" , "Shankar, Ravi V" , Vikas Shivappa , "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" , linux-kernel , x86 Subject: RE: [PATCH 08/32] Define CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Thread-Topic: [PATCH 08/32] Define CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Thread-Index: AQHR3IkKtnF0IsW28UqzbHe3S6UBtaAWnhOAgAAHXDCAAKyJgP//jDtA Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:18:20 +0000 Message-ID: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205DFD4BAF@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1468371785-53231-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1468371785-53231-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205DFD4AB3@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 2:10 PM > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Yu, Fenghua wrote: > > Here is why this patch behaves like this: > > > > This patch and actually first 12 patches are directly from last year's > > cgroup base CAT patch series. The last year's patch series had gone 16 > > versions already. Because the first 12 patches have been reviewed many > > times, we keep them untouched (except removing cgroup code in patch 8 > > and some unused cdp code in patch 11) and release other patches on top > > of the first 12 patches. > > Which is not making the review any simpler. In order to understand the > modifications I have to go back and page in the original stuff from last year > once again. So I have to read the original patch first to understand the > modifications and then get the overall picture of the new stuff. Please fold > stuff back to the proper places so I can start reviewing this thing under the > new design idea instead of twisting my brain around two designs. Ok. I will do that. > > > I fully agree this patch should be split if we want to have a good > > overall patch series. > > Good. > > Thanks, > > tglx