From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263592AbTDTOrL (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 10:47:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263594AbTDTOrL (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 10:47:11 -0400 Received: from mail.actcom.co.il ([192.114.47.13]:46043 "EHLO smtp1.actcom.net.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263592AbTDTOrJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 10:47:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA2B590.9060809@shemesh.biz> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:58:24 +0300 From: Shachar Shemesh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327 Debian/1.3-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wichert Akkerman CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: BK->CVS, kernel.bkbits.net References: <20030417162723.GA29380@work.bitmover.com> <20030420013440.GG2528@phunnypharm.org> <3EA24CF8.5080609@shemesh.biz> <20030420130123.GK2528@phunnypharm.org> <3EA2A285.2070307@shemesh.biz> <20030420134712.GM2528@phunnypharm.org> <3EA2B1BB.2060600@shemesh.biz> <20030420144741.GF22848@wiggy.net> In-Reply-To: <20030420144741.GF22848@wiggy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wichert Akkerman wrote: >Previously Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > >>The site offers binary images for download for FreeBSD and Digital Unix >>(Alpha), and Solaris Sparc. It is therefor unlikely that this is a >>problem with lack of development tools. More probably - the maintainers >>did not have these platforms available to them. >> >> > >Are you offering to bootstrap Modula-3 on other Linux architectures? > >Wichert. > > > Unfortunetly, I am as swamped as many other here. (I don't have any non-Intel platform available to me even if I did have the time, except perhaps a 68000 Amiga 500, which may or may not still be in working order, but defenitely has no networking). I am saying that cvsup IN ADDITION to the rsync will be nice. If the site administrators can't maintain it, rsync is preferable for the obvious portability reasons.. Not trying to cause anyone any extra work. Sorry for the noise. -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration consultant Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/