From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261767AbTDXPIb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:08:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262713AbTDXPIb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:08:31 -0400 Received: from watch.techsource.com ([209.208.48.130]:462 "EHLO techsource.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261767AbTDXPIa (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:08:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA804A8.8070608@techsource.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:37:12 -0400 From: Timothy Miller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamie Lokier CC: Andreas Jellinghaus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Flame Linus to a crisp! References: <20030424083730.5F79A2127F@dungeon.inka.de> <20030424085913.GH28253@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jamie Lokier wrote: >Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > >>In ka.lists.linux.kernel, you wrote: >> >> >>> I want to make it clear that DRM is perfectly ok with Linux! >>> >>> >>thanks for such a clear statement. >> >> > >Anybody would think Linux was written solely by Linus, the way His >words are taken as summarising the intent of all its authors... > > > > You are free to make a fork of the Linux tree for which DRM is NOT ok. Likewise, Linus is free to allow or disallow whatever he feels like in HIS tree.