From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263428AbTDYVyR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:54:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263890AbTDYVyR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:54:17 -0400 Received: from watch.techsource.com ([209.208.48.130]:32959 "EHLO techsource.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263428AbTDYVyP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA9B189.4020208@techsource.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:07:05 -0400 From: Timothy Miller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamie Lokier CC: jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ia32 kernel on amd64 box? References: <20030425214500.GA20221@ncsu.edu> <20030425174941.A21747@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030425215654.GB2132@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jamie Lokier wrote: >Bill Nottingham wrote: > > >>Red Hat 7.2 may or may not work, I'm not sure we've tried back that far. >> >> > >Why - is there anything at all missing from the AMD64's x86 >compatibility, prior to activating 64 bit mode? > >Or is it just that it should work, but you haven't tested it? > > > > How about peripheral compatibility?