From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263552AbTD1Mmp (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:42:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263558AbTD1Mmo (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:42:44 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:2477 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263552AbTD1Mml (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:42:41 -0400 Message-ID: <3EAD2467.8040101@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:53:59 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rwhron@earthlink.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68 References: <20030424124728.GA1477@rushmore> In-Reply-To: <20030424124728.GA1477@rushmore> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: >mount -t reiserfs -o defaults,noatime /dev/sdc1 /fs1 > You should benchmark us with notail option if you want it to be fair compared to less space conserving filesystems. This has a substantial performance impact, and since you don't measure space usage in these benchmarks.... > ---------------- Sequential ---------- > ----- Create ----- ---- Delete ---- > files /sec %CPU Eff /sec %CPU Eff >2.5.68-ext3 65536 10828 70.3 15395 21160 98.0 2159 >2.5.68-reiserfs 131072 2935 37.3 7861 1787 25.7 6963 > What is the meaning of the files parameter, and why is our number different from the other filesystems? -- Hans