From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262393AbTD3UqW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:46:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262398AbTD3UqW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:46:22 -0400
Received: from watch.techsource.com ([209.208.48.130]:13212 "EHLO
	techsource.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262393AbTD3UqV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:46:21 -0400
Message-ID: <3EB0397A.2070108@techsource.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:00:42 -0400
From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
CC: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Pointless Waffle] Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to
 a crisp!]
References: <200304302021.h3UKLYlf001981@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



John Bradford wrote:
>>Was the whole DRM discussion off-topic?
> 
> 
> It was certainly ironic that the subject was 'Why DRM exists', when it
> clearly doesn't within the scope of the Linux kernel, and isn't on the
> horizon for the Linux kernel either, which is what this mailing list
> is intended for.
> 
> John.
> 
> 

Doesn't the lkml FAQ say that posts which complain about other posts 
being off-topic are themselves off-topic?

<ahem>  :)