From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266396AbTGEQ3S (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:29:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266397AbTGEQ3S (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:46528 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266396AbTGEQ3P (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:29:15 -0400 Message-ID: <3F070037.6080501@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 12:43:35 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix DMI missing string in -bk2 snapshot References: <200307051609.h65G9Y88032402@hraefn.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200307051609.h65G9Y88032402@hraefn.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > (Now Jeff has snapshots I can fix these things - thanks Jeff) Note that I screwed up the version number on the Makefile, and so, I recreated the snapshots from scratch. 2.4.21-bk1 is out there, freshly generated... and it supercedes the previous 2.4.21-bk[12]. Apologies for any confusion, this should be a one-time thing. Jeff