From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266422AbTGJWWr (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:22:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266502AbTGJWWr (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:22:47 -0400 Received: from c3po.aoltw.net ([64.236.137.25]:10424 "EHLO netscape.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266422AbTGJWWp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:22:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3F0DEAA0.4050909@netscape.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:37:20 -0700 From: jgmyers@netscape.com (John Myers) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel McNeil CC: "linux-aio@kvack.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH libaio] add timeout to io_queue_run and remove io_queue_wait References: <1057712224.11509.35.camel@dell_ss5.pdx.osdl.net> <3F0C97C0.2060408@netscape.com> <1057794581.10851.66.camel@dell_ss5.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <1057794581.10851.66.camel@dell_ss5.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Looking through the linux-aio archives, it seems I was confusing io_queue_run() with io_queue_init() and io_queue_release(), which Ben LaHaise reports as being used by Oracle. In any case, I have no objection to removing io_queue_run() or io_queue_wait(). But then I don't maintain the library.