linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
Cc: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs mailing list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:10:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F204B3B.3040802@tupshin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com>

Nikita Danilov wrote:

>Daniel Egger writes:
> > 
> > How failsafe is it to switch off the power several times? When the
> > filesystem really works atomically I should have either the old or the
> > new version but no mixture. Does it still need to fsck or is the
> > transaction replay done at mount time? In case one still needs fsck,
> > what's the probability of needing user interaction? How long does it
> > need to get a filesystem back into a consistent state after a powerloss
> > (approx. per MB/GB)?
>
>I should warn everybody that reiser4 is _highly_ _experimental_ at this
>moment. Don't use it for production.
>
I'd like to ask this question differently: How failsafe is reiserfs4 
*theoretically*. Assuming no bugs in implementation, what is the true 
import of its atomic nature? Strengths and potential weaknesses?

-Thanks
-Tupshin


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-24 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-23 21:02 Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Hans Reiser
2003-07-24  4:26 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24  4:31   ` Shawn
2003-07-24  4:56     ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24  5:21       ` Shawn
2003-07-24  5:33         ` Shawn
2003-07-24 11:10         ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-24 15:10           ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 15:26             ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-24 15:32               ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 15:54                 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-24 15:32               ` Shawn
2003-07-27 12:28           ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 12:45             ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-27 14:01               ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 15:04               ` Gene Heskett
2003-07-24 15:59 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-24 17:07   ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-24 21:10     ` Tupshin Harper [this message]
2003-07-25 12:57       ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-25  0:39     ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-25 13:02       ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-25 14:20         ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-25 14:39           ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26  1:08             ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-26  7:19               ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26 14:13                 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-26 14:54                   ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26 15:21                     ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27  3:28                       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-27 10:30                       ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-27 11:05                         ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 11:46                           ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-08 14:01                         ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-08 14:28                           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-08 23:58                             ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-09  0:29                               ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-09  0:38                                 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 13:31                     ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:13                       ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-27 13:28                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:10                     ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 14:15                       ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-13 20:12                         ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-14  5:04                           ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-14 14:10                             ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-15 11:15                               ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-15 15:28                               ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-15 15:53                                 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-14 13:58                           ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 15:30                       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-27 15:49                         ` Alan Cox
2003-08-08 13:23                           ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-28 11:30                       ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-26 17:14                 ` Jussi Laako
2003-07-27 13:35                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-08 14:08                   ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 12:59           ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:16             ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 15:32               ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-08 14:29                 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-28 12:44               ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-28 13:06                 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-28 13:29                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-28 13:48                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 12:38   ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-26  8:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-27 13:24   ` Hans Reiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F204B3B.3040802@tupshin.com \
    --to=tupshin@tupshin.com \
    --cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
    --cc=degger@fhm.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).