From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271037AbTG1CUI (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:20:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271007AbTG1CTN (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:19:13 -0400 Received: from evrtwa1-ar2-4-33-045-074.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net ([4.33.45.74]:35467 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272648AbTG1CQC (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:16:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3F248AE5.4000204@candelatech.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:31:01 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: Bas Bloemsaat , netdev@oss.sgi.com, layes@loran.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices References: <20030727151234.6e2aa57e.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030727151234.6e2aa57e.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David S. Miller wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:52:48 +0200 (CEST) > Bas Bloemsaat wrote: > > >>I think this is unwanted behaviour. > > > Not a bug. This behavior is on purpose. What is the benefit of having it work as it does currently in the standard kernel? I too was supprised to find it works this way, but have since converted to use source-routes. Interestingly, can only use 252 or so source routes because the rfc for netlink only gives us an 8-bit identifier for the route id, so this still breaks if you want to run lots of vlans or something like that. Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com