From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262273AbTG1LRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262290AbTG1LRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:17 -0400 Received: from nic.bme.hu ([152.66.115.1]:59110 "EHLO nic.bme.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262273AbTG1LRQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3F25095B.6070607@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:30:35 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Egger Cc: Yury Umanets , Nikita Danilov , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , reiserfs mailing list , Alexander Lyamin Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja> <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com> <1059093594.29239.314.camel@sonja> <16161.10863.793737.229170@laputa.namesys.com> <1059142851.6962.18.camel@sonja> <1059143985.19594.3.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059181687.10059.5.camel@sonja> <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059228808.10692.7.camel@sonja> <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja> In-Reply-To: <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Egger wrote: >Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they >have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge >difference between those two. > I am told that they do by flx. After all, they are most used for the FAT filesystem. -- Hans