From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S272891AbTG3Nb5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:31:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272892AbTG3Nb4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:31:56 -0400
Received: from mail-04.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.36]:15117 "HELO
	mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S272891AbTG3Nb4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:31:56 -0400
Message-ID: <3F27C4A7.5030506@ii.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:14:15 +0800
From: Wade <neroz@ii.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030724 Thunderbird/0.1a
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity
References: <200307301038.49869.kernel@kolivas.org>	 <1059553792.548.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>	 <200307301040.38858.m.c.p@wolk-project.de>	 <1059557903.3f27920f97d4a@kolivas.org> <1059569806.525.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
In-Reply-To: <1059569806.525.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 11:38, Con Kolivas wrote:
> 
> 
>>The obvious question still needs to be asked here. How does vanilla compare to
>>vanilla +O11.1?
> 
> 
> Vanilla has serious interactivity problems for me. Vanilla + O11.1 is
> the second best scheduler I've ever used (the best is clearly O10). So
> this, indeed, are good news, at least for me :-)
> 

O10 is better(the best I've used so far) for me too.