From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Dominik Brugger <ml.dominik83@gmx.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:30:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F291A0F.1050406@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030731094749.GB464@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
>>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they
>>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For
>>example, on suspend:
>>
>> ...
>
> Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems
> like a bug to me.
Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined
more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using
both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here).
Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new"
infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only
register to the old one? I'd rather see those drivers (about
a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call
them the bug...
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-31 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 22:08 OHCI problems with suspend/resume Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 1:19 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2003-07-24 10:24 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 17:10 ` David Brownell
2003-07-24 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 12:37 ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-24 12:56 ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-24 22:04 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 22:46 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-25 7:52 ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-25 15:06 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2003-07-25 17:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-25 22:48 ` David Brownell
2003-07-26 16:02 ` Alan Stern
2003-07-26 21:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-26 21:16 ` David Brownell
2003-07-27 14:57 ` Alan Stern
2003-07-31 3:27 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 3:51 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 9:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:37 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 14:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 17:32 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 17:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:30 ` David Brownell [this message]
2003-07-31 16:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 9:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:23 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 16:07 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:55 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 22:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 22:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 23:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-08-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01 0:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-04 19:25 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01 18:20 ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-29 13:16 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2003-07-31 14:18 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01 17:41 ` David Brownell
2003-08-07 22:35 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F291A0F.1050406@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ml.dominik83@gmx.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).