From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S273018AbTGaNmx (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:42:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272998AbTGaNlA (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:41:00 -0400 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:7613 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272972AbTGaNkz (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:40:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3F291B9E.10109@pacbell.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:37:34 -0700 From: David Brownell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alan Stern , Dominik Brugger , kernel list , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume References: <1059153629.528.2.camel@gaston> <3F21B3BF.1030104@pacbell.net> <20030726210123.GD266@elf.ucw.cz> <3F288CAB.6020401@pacbell.net> <20030731094231.GA464@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030731094231.GA464@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: >>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I >>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on >>seems like it needs polishing yet! :) > > > Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM. USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they won't notice missing features there. Regressions are a different story though. But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?) might want to veto suspending devices that are being used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist. - Dave