linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lou Langholtz <ldl@aros.net>
To: Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 NBD driver: remove send/recieve race for request
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 01:34:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F30AF81.4070308@aros.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F30510A.E918924B@SteelEye.com>

Paul Clements wrote:

> . . .
>
>>Except that in the error case, the send basically didn't succeed. So no
>>need to worry about recieving a reply and no race possibility in that case.
>>    
>>
>
>As long as the request is on the queue, it is possible for nbd-client to
>die, thus freeing the request (via nbd_clear_que -> nbd_end_request),
>and leaving us with a race between the free and do_nbd_request()
>accessing the request structure.
>
>--
>Paul
>  
>
Quite right. I missed that case in this last patch (when nbd_do_it has 
returned and NBD_DO_IT is about to call nbd_clear_que [1]). Just moving 
the errors increment (near the end of nbd_send_req) to within the 
semaphore protected region would fix this particular case. An even 
larger race window exists with the request getting free'd when 
nbd-client is used to disconnect in which it calls NBD_CLEAR_QUE before 
NBD_DISCONNECT [2]. In this case, moving the errors increment doesn't 
help of course since the nbd_clear_queue in 2.6.0-test2 doesn't bother 
to check the tx_lock semaphore anyway. I believe reference counting the 
request (as you suggest) would protect against both these windows though.

It's ironic that I'd fixed both these races [1+2] a ways back in an 
earlier patch and had forgotten about these cases in this last patch I 
submitted. The earlier patch p6.2 against linux-2.5.73 looks about 
right. By that patch, the call to clear the queue before NBD_DO_IT 
returned was gone and it made sure the clear_queue functionality would 
return -EBUSY if invoked when the socket wasn't NULL (and potentially 
while nbd_send_req functionality could be called). Not that I'm arguing 
we should roll in these ealier patches again. That would re-introduce 
the compatibility break which I wouldn't want either.

Will you be working on closing the other clear-queue race also then? 
Here's the comments I shared on this in one of these earlier patches 
that didn't make it into the mainstream distro (from patch #7):

                /*

                 * Don't allow queue to be cleared while device is running!

                 * Device must be stopped (disconnected) first. Otherwise

                 * clearing is meaningless & can lock up processes: it's a

                 * race with users who may queue up more requests after the

                 * clearing is done that may then never be freed till the

                 * system reboots or clear que is run again which just

                 * opens the race yet again.

                 */



  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-06  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-05 16:51 [PATCH] 2.6.0 NBD driver: remove send/recieve race for request Lou Langholtz
2003-08-05 19:37 ` Paul Clements
2003-08-05 22:48   ` Lou Langholtz
2003-08-06  0:51     ` Paul Clements
2003-08-06  7:34       ` Lou Langholtz [this message]
2003-08-08  5:02         ` Paul Clements
2003-08-08  5:27           ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-08 17:05             ` Paul Clements
2003-08-08  6:30           ` Lou Langholtz
2003-08-08  6:43             ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-08  6:59             ` Jens Axboe
2003-08-08 15:00               ` Paul Clements
2003-08-25  9:58                 ` Jens Axboe
2003-08-08 16:47             ` Paul Clements
2003-08-08 20:07               ` [PATCH 2.6.0-test2-mm] nbd: fix send/receive/shutdown/disconnect races Paul Clements
2003-08-09 22:10                 ` [PATCH 2.4.22-pre] nbd: fix race conditions Paul Clements

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F30AF81.4070308@aros.net \
    --to=ldl@aros.net \
    --cc=Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).