linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lou Langholtz <ldl@aros.net>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: [2.4.21]: nbd ksymoops-report
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 08:46:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F326656.9080603@aros.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308071604.06015.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de>

Bernd Schubert wrote:

>Hi,
>
>every time when nbd-client disconnects a nbd-device the decoded oops 
>from below will happen. 
>This only happens after we upgraded from 2.4.20 to 2.4.21, 
>so I guess the backported update from 2.5.50 causes this. 
>Since the changelog for 2.4.22-rc1 doesn't describe any updates to nbd, 
>I think this will be also valid for this kernel version. I will check this 
>later on this evening.
>  
>
>. . .
>  
>
I've seen oops's from nbd disconnect in 2.4 also when some blocks were 
still being flushed (using the standard linux kernel distributed nbd 
driver). I don't know of any back ported fixes to nbd of the ones I've 
been introducing into 2.5+ kernels and have no idea though what could 
have changed between 2.4.20 and 2.4.21 that causes the diff you've seen 
(unless you just never tried the disconnect while blocks still had to be 
flushed before). But a lot of the nbd fixes that have been getting 
introduced into 2.5+ could very well close races and eliminate oops's in 
2.4 also. Getting some more exposure to these fixes in the 2.5+ kernels 
has made a lot of sense since these aren't supposed to be as stable and 
things can be tested more acceptably but at some point back-porting 
starts making sense too. Are we at that point yet?? I don't know. Paul 
Clements is now the NBD maintainer. We should see what he says (I've 
CC'd him on this email).

Stay in touch.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-07 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-07 14:04 [2.4.21]: nbd ksymoops-report Bernd Schubert
2003-08-07 14:46 ` Lou Langholtz [this message]
2003-08-07 16:53 ` Paul Clements
2003-08-07 17:34   ` Paul Clements
2003-08-07 18:40     ` Bernd Schubert
2003-08-07 18:45       ` Paul Clements
2003-08-07 22:25     ` Paul Clements
2003-08-08 13:10       ` Bernd Schubert
2003-08-07 17:40   ` Lou Langholtz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F326656.9080603@aros.net \
    --to=ldl@aros.net \
    --cc=Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).