Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Mark Watts]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....

http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html


The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image chip 
- - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?

Cheers,

Mark.

- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/M6DABn4EFUVUIO0RApDvAJoDz1ExF/zNuzsydq8/q/pB8ZaCvwCg58pW
Rq7zYfp+o7KKEnVIUw/IDmI=
=kCCB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Jeff Garzik]

Mark Watts wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
> 
> http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
> 
> 
> The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image chip 
> - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?


If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.

	Jeff

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Mark Watts]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Mark Watts wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
> >
> > http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
> >
> >
> > The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
> > chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
>
> If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.

Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for 
the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?

# hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
# echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings

Cheers,

Mark.

- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/M6+QBn4EFUVUIO0RAsTlAJ47iXTKk7/VUEk/V5AdLe/5FcJODwCg+9MK
lli1yAzptbJho+gqpF/zxHc=
=DSWc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Jeff Garzik]

Mark Watts wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
>>Mark Watts wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
>>>
>>>http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
>>>
>>>
>>>The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
>>>chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
>>
>>If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
> 
> 
> Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for 
> the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
> 
> # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings


I have no idea :(   I'm off in libata land, which will soon support 
Silicon Image SATA as well...

	Jeff

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Justin Cormack]

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 15:29, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mark Watts wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >>Mark Watts wrote:
> >>
> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
> >>>
> >>>http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
> >>>chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
> >>
> >>If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
> > 
> > 
> > Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for 
> > the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
> > 
> > # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> > # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings
> 
> 
> I have no idea :(   I'm off in libata land, which will soon support 
> Silicon Image SATA as well...

the answer is yes - there hasnt been an update to the driver. Andre
Hedrick says he has fixed it a month or so ago but has not released it
yet.

btw echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings is not for
good performance (it may halve your performance on some drives) it is a
bug workaround.

Look forward to testing libata on Silicon Image.

Justin

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Alan Cox]

On Gwe, 2003-08-08 at 15:11, Mark Watts wrote:
> Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for 
> the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
> 
> # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings

In -ac pretty much everything "just works". Just finishing off one or
two last issues

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Alan Cox]

On Gwe, 2003-08-08 at 16:16, Justin Cormack wrote:
> the answer is yes - there hasnt been an update to the driver. Andre
> Hedrick says he has fixed it a month or so ago but has not released it
> yet.

The answer is no - the siimage driver isnt maintained by Andre.

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Mark Watts]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Look forward to testing libata on Silicon Image.

Dippy question - is libata a 2.6 thing or is it going to be backported to 2.4?

- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/N0sbBn4EFUVUIO0RAu37AJ9TOb3+iQqBKYkRlsI+FM21ZuRIwwCfb2eB
j5D3k1JPfKTEdvvgclssok4=
=kmUt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Christian Reichert]

Mark,

I certainly have seen libata patches for 2.4 - search the mailinglist archive 
for libata annoucements or just do a google.

Cheers,
    Chris

Zitat von Mark Watts <m.watts@eris.qinetiq.com>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> > Look forward to testing libata on Silicon Image.
> 
> Dippy question - is libata a 2.6 thing or is it going to be backported to
> 2.4?
> 
> - -- 
> Mark Watts
> Senior Systems Engineer
> QinetiQ TIM
> St Andrews Road, Malvern
> GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/N0sbBn4EFUVUIO0RAu37AJ9TOb3+iQqBKYkRlsI+FM21ZuRIwwCfb2eB
> j5D3k1JPfKTEdvvgclssok4=
> =kmUt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...

[Jeff Garzik]

Mark Watts wrote:
> Dippy question - is libata a 2.6 thing or is it going to be backported to 2.4?


It's for 2.4 and 2.6 right now.  You can get libata simply by using Alan 
  Cox's -ac patches for 2.4 or 2.6, or download directly from my FTP 
directories:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/patchkits/
(look in "2.4" and "2.6" sub-directories for *libata*)

	Jeff