From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270688AbTHJVQy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:16:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270691AbTHJVQy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:16:54 -0400 Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.28]:49350 "EHLO mwinf0303.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270688AbTHJVQv (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:16:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3F36B703.90405@wanadoo.fr> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 23:20:03 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Colinet?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test2 : size of /proc/kcore is different from RAM size. References: <3F36A74B.6090200@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rémi Colinet wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed that the /proc/kcore file has a different size (1Go) > compared with the available memory of my box (640Mo). > > [root@tigre01 kernel]# dmesg | grep Memory > Memory: 643148k/655360k available (2331k kernel code, 11424k reserved, > 730k data, 348k init, 0k highmem) > > [root@tigre01 proc]# ls -l /proc | grep kcore > -r-------- 1 root root 1073692672 Aug 10 21:43 kcore > [root@tigre01 proc]# > > Is it a bug or just a new behaviour of the /proc/kcore? > > Regards, > Rémi It's ok with 2.6.0-test3-mm1. Remi