From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262612AbTHaKq4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 06:46:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262600AbTHaKq4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 06:46:56 -0400 Received: from dyn-ctb-210-9-245-93.webone.com.au ([210.9.245.93]:18439 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262612AbTHaKqV (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 06:46:21 -0400 Message-ID: <3F51D1F5.8060607@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:46:13 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Ian Kumlien , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [SHED] Questions. References: <1062324435.9959.56.camel@big.pomac.com> <3F51CB44.3080805@cyberone.com.au> <1062325465.5171.60.camel@big.pomac.com> <3F51D0BD.8030307@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3F51D0BD.8030307@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > >> >> And is the preempt min quantum in there? >> > > No. If you do that, you'll either break the priority concept very > badly, or you'll break it a little bit and turn the scheduler into > an O(n) one. Well I guess you could just break it a little bit without it being O(n)