From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262126AbTIMLR3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:17:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262129AbTIMLR3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:17:29 -0400 Received: from dyn-ctb-210-9-245-223.webone.com.au ([210.9.245.223]:52999 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262126AbTIMLRU (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3F62FCBB.2020807@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:17:15 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cliff White CC: linux-kernel , akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Nick's scheduler policy v15 References: <200309121839.h8CIdao22695@mail.osdl.org> <3F627BAC.5040706@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3F627BAC.5040706@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Cliff White wrote: > >>> Hi, >>> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v15/ >>> >>> >> >> Here are results for several recent kernels for comparison. >> the sched-rollup-nopolicy tests are still running. Performance of v15 >> suffers as number of CPU's increase. >> At 8 cpu's, delta is noticeable vs stock -test5 >> cliffw >> > > OK, so it hasn't crashed? Do you have the profiles up? Nevermind, I found them. It looks like its balancing way too much. I've a few ideas. I should be getting time on a NUMA box there at OSDL soon, so I won't bother you with untested stuff. Thanks again for doing these.